|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{CoJ Case Header}} | | {{CoJ Case Header}} |
| {{CoJCases}} | | {{CoJCases}} |
| '''DB vs Darkblade''' was the fourty-fourth case tried by the [[Chamber of Justice]]. The sitting [[Justicar]] was [[Jac Cotelin]], the Left Hand of Justice was [[Montresor]], and the Right Hand of Justice was [[Halcyon Taldrya]]. | | '''DB vs Darkblade''' was the fourty-fourth case tried by the [[Chamber of Justice]]. The sitting [[Justicar]] was [[Jac Cotelin]], the Left Hand of Justice was Montresor, and the Right Hand of Justice was [[Halcyon Taldrya]]. |
|
| |
|
| == Basic Case Information == | | == Basic Case Information == |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| == Related News Posts == | | == Related News Posts == |
| | |
| | Posted in DJB News by Grand Master Jac Cotelin on 03/20/2015 @ 1:59 AM |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Members of the Dark Jedi Brotherhood - |
| | |
| | The Chamber of Justice has convened in seven matters, having brought charges against members and completed the process of adjudication for each case. The Chamber has issued detailed verdicts and Justicar Opinions for each case which can be found in the PDF files linked below. The primary opinion, which was incorporated by reference into other opinions due to overlapping issues, is the DB v. Delak Krennel opinion. I direct you attention to that opinion first. Please note that the written opinion is generally found on the second page of the following documents, after announcement of the verdict. |
| | |
| | The cases and verdicts are summarized as follows: |
| | |
| | Case # 44 - DB v. Darkblade - [https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_aPPJY2LL0QMEhQUUJYeVgxTkk/view?usp=sharing| Opinion PDF] |
| | *Count 1 - Cheating - GUILTY by plea |
| | *Punishment - Two-grade Demotion, LoR, Strict Probation |
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| == Justicar's Opinion == | | == Justicar's Opinion == |
|
| |
|
| | '''Facts:''' |
| | |
| | On January 18 and 19, 2015, the Defendant and Jedi Hunter Chizz submitted |
| | identical submissions to the Round 1 Puzzle Event in the Eleventh Great |
| | Jedi War. The Seneschal coded the event so that no two puzzles for members |
| | were identical. As a result, no two members could have the same answer, and |
| | the Seneschal flagged your submissions. |
| | |
| | As punishment for these submissions, and violating the spirit of |
| | competition, the Defendant was initially punished through a |
| | disqualification from the event. Thereafter, the Chamber of Justice |
| | conducted an investigation and, upon due consideration, decided to issue |
| | charges. |
| | |
| | '''Opinion:''' |
| | |
| | As to the general principles of Covenant interpretation and Chamber |
| | policies, the Opinion set forth in DB vs. Delak Krennel, Case #0042, is |
| | incorporated by reference. As an additional point, I note that the |
| | Defendant was extremely unruly in pushing for a verdict. We explained to |
| | the Defendant that the Chamber had changed hands and time would be needed |
| | to resolve these matters, but the Defendant’s conduct toward the Chamber |
| | remained hostile. Moreover, his hostility and brash statements led to the |
| | conclusion of the Chamber that his confession was not sincere; the |
| | Defendant seemed to be upset that he was caught, rather than being honestly |
| | repentant. While I have not increased any penalties as a result of these |
| | findings, I note for the record that in dealing with the Chamber, |
| | respectful conduct will go a long way to ensuring the Chamber has sympathy |
| | for you. |
| | |
| | The Chamber hopes that the air of superiority clears away from this member |
| | and that he matures into a good member of the Brotherhood. While the |
| | punishment is justified and necessary, the Chamber asks that the |
| | Defendant’s peers join me in forgiving him for the violations of the |
| | Covenant and seek to bring him further into the fold of active membership. |
| | |
| | Signed and sealed in Justice,<br> |
| | Jac Ae-Sequiera Cotelin<br> |
| | Justicar and High Protector of the Dark Jedi Brotherhood |
|
| |
|
| == Points of Interest == | | == Points of Interest == |
DB vs Darkblade was the fourty-fourth case tried by the Chamber of Justice. The sitting Justicar was Jac Cotelin, the Left Hand of Justice was Montresor, and the Right Hand of Justice was Halcyon Taldrya.
Basic Case Information
Defendants Name
Charges
Verdict
Sentence
- Two-Grade Demotion
- Letter of Reprimand
- 6-Month Probation (Including a 3-month prohibition on promotion)
Related News Posts
Posted in DJB News by Grand Master Jac Cotelin on 03/20/2015 @ 1:59 AM
Members of the Dark Jedi Brotherhood -
The Chamber of Justice has convened in seven matters, having brought charges against members and completed the process of adjudication for each case. The Chamber has issued detailed verdicts and Justicar Opinions for each case which can be found in the PDF files linked below. The primary opinion, which was incorporated by reference into other opinions due to overlapping issues, is the DB v. Delak Krennel opinion. I direct you attention to that opinion first. Please note that the written opinion is generally found on the second page of the following documents, after announcement of the verdict.
The cases and verdicts are summarized as follows:
Case # 44 - DB v. Darkblade - Opinion PDF
- Count 1 - Cheating - GUILTY by plea
- Punishment - Two-grade Demotion, LoR, Strict Probation
Justicar's Opinion
Facts:
On January 18 and 19, 2015, the Defendant and Jedi Hunter Chizz submitted
identical submissions to the Round 1 Puzzle Event in the Eleventh Great
Jedi War. The Seneschal coded the event so that no two puzzles for members
were identical. As a result, no two members could have the same answer, and
the Seneschal flagged your submissions.
As punishment for these submissions, and violating the spirit of
competition, the Defendant was initially punished through a
disqualification from the event. Thereafter, the Chamber of Justice
conducted an investigation and, upon due consideration, decided to issue
charges.
Opinion:
As to the general principles of Covenant interpretation and Chamber
policies, the Opinion set forth in DB vs. Delak Krennel, Case #0042, is
incorporated by reference. As an additional point, I note that the
Defendant was extremely unruly in pushing for a verdict. We explained to
the Defendant that the Chamber had changed hands and time would be needed
to resolve these matters, but the Defendant’s conduct toward the Chamber
remained hostile. Moreover, his hostility and brash statements led to the
conclusion of the Chamber that his confession was not sincere; the
Defendant seemed to be upset that he was caught, rather than being honestly
repentant. While I have not increased any penalties as a result of these
findings, I note for the record that in dealing with the Chamber,
respectful conduct will go a long way to ensuring the Chamber has sympathy
for you.
The Chamber hopes that the air of superiority clears away from this member
and that he matures into a good member of the Brotherhood. While the
punishment is justified and necessary, the Chamber asks that the
Defendant’s peers join me in forgiving him for the violations of the
Covenant and seek to bring him further into the fold of active membership.
Signed and sealed in Justice,
Jac Ae-Sequiera Cotelin
Justicar and High Protector of the Dark Jedi Brotherhood
Points of Interest