|
|
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <center>
| | {{CoJ Case Header}} |
| <div style="border:0px width:350px;">
| |
| | |
| [[File:004_DB_vs._DarkWarchief.png|350px]]
| |
| | |
| </div>
| |
| </center>
| |
| {{CoJCases}} | | {{CoJCases}} |
| '''DB vs DarkWarchief''' was the fourth case tried by the [[Chamber of Justice]] after the Brotherhood's split from the Emperor's Hammer. The sitting [[Justicar]] was [[Keirdagh Taldrya Cantor]], and the Left Hand of Justice was [[Sith Bloodfyre]]. | | '''DB vs DarkWarchief''' was the fourth case tried by the [[Chamber of Justice]] after the Brotherhood's split from the Emperor's Hammer. The sitting [[Justicar]] was [[Keirdagh Taldrya Cantor]], and the Left Hand of Justice was [[Sith Bloodfyre]]. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Basic Case Information == | | == Basic Case Information == |
| | === Defendants Name === |
| | * DarkWarchief |
|
| |
|
| ==== Defendants Name ====
| | === Charges === |
| * DarkWarchief
| |
| | |
| ==== Charges ====
| |
| * Discrimination (2 counts) | | * Discrimination (2 counts) |
|
| |
|
| ==== Verdict ====
| | === Verdict === |
| * Guilty on both counts | | * Guilty on both counts |
|
| |
|
| ==== Sentence ====
| | === Sentence === |
| * [[Demotion]] from [[Novice]] to [[Apprentice]] | | * [[Demotion]] from [[Novice]] to [[Apprentice]] |
| * Public apology to the Brotherhood and insulted member | | * Public apology to the Brotherhood and insulted member |
| * Two months [[Probation]] | | * Two months [[Probation]] |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Case Summary == | | == Case Summary == |
| Not many details have survived in the [[Chamber of Justice]] archive concerning this case. In summary, DarkWarchief insulted the religion and sexual orientation of another Brotherhood member. This was brought to the Justicar's attention and he charged DarkWarchief with discrimination. He was found guilty, demoted to [[Apprentice]], forced to apologize, and given two months of [[Probation]]. | | Not many details have survived in the [[Chamber of Justice]] archive concerning this case. In summary, DarkWarchief insulted the religion and sexual orientation of another Brotherhood member. This was brought to the Justicar's attention and he charged DarkWarchief with discrimination. He was found guilty, demoted to [[Apprentice]], forced to apologize, and given two months of [[Probation]]. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Related News Posts == | | == Related News Posts == |
| * No news posts were made regarding this case. | | * No news posts were made regarding this case. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Justicar's Opinion == | | == Justicar's Opinion == |
| * At this point in Chamber history, the Justicar did not issue opinions on cases. | | * At this point in Chamber history, the Justicar did not issue opinions on cases. |
| | |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == Points of Interest == | | == Points of Interest == |
| This trial marked the Chamber's first usage of the newly authored [[Dark Covenant (Original)]]. Unlike the [[Dark Covenant]] of today, the original was basically a list of bylaws the club members had to abide by. Their creation directly lead to the "Articles of Conduct and Reprimand" listed in the current Dark Covenant. Therefore the use of this original set of rules by the Chamber is a direct precedent for the current Chamber's use of the updated Covenant. In addition, it can be said that this is the first time the Chamber of Justice prosecuted a member for insulting another member. This was one of the first times the Justicar was asked to decide whether the "banter" typical amongst members on IRC had gone too far - a situation that is very common today. | | This trial marked the Chamber's first usage of the newly authored [[Dark Covenant (original)|Dark Covenant]]. Unlike the [[Covenant]] of today, the original was basically a list of bylaws the club members had to abide by. Their creation directly lead to the "Articles of Conduct and Reprimand" listed in the current Dark Covenant. Therefore the use of this original set of rules by the Chamber is a direct precedent for the current Chamber's use of the updated Covenant. In addition, it can be said that this is the first time the Chamber of Justice prosecuted a member for insulting another member. This was one of the first times the Justicar was asked to decide whether the "banter" typical amongst members on IRC had gone too far - a situation that is very common today. |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Chamber Case History]] | | [[Category:Chamber Case History]] |