CoJ Case 024

This article is part of the series:

Chamber of Justice

Cases

001 DB vs. Blade 002 DB vs. Mirei 003 DB vs. Tiberius 004 DB vs. DarkWarchief 005 DB vs. Selket 006 DB vs. Gilkane 007 DB vs. Oberst 008 DB vs. Kromtal 009 DB vs. Halc 010 DB vs. Boba nil 011 DB vs. Dismal 012 DB vs. Tissaya 013 DB vs. Bane 014 DB vs. Ashura 015 DB vs. Tissaya 016 DB vs. Jaymz 017 DB vs. Cannabisia 018 DB vs. Khobai 019 DB vs. Ricco 020 DB vs. Ricco 021 DB vs. Cornix 022 DB vs. Drepo Mcarc 023 DB vs. Jason Hunter 024 DB vs. Raidoner 025 DB vs. Sashar 026 DB vs. Androc 027 DB vs. Krandon 028 DB vs. Braecen 029 DB vs. Jalek 030 DB vs. Arack 031 DB vs. Archangel 032 DB vs. Raidoner 033 DB vs. Robin Hawk 034 DB vs. Coop Ter-an 035 DB vs. Coop Ter-an 036 DB vs. Darkone 037 DB vs. Wuntila 038 DB vs. Fremoc Pepoi 039 DB vs. Solus Gar 040 DB vs. Arden Karn 041 DB vs. Ronovi Tavisaen 042 DB vs. Delak Krennel 043 DB vs. Rayna Krennel 044 DB vs. Darkblade 045 DB vs. Chizz 046 DB vs. Shorurra 047 DB vs. Turel Sorenn 048 DB vs. Nicolai "Rod" Rodell 049 DB vs. Seraphol Ceartas 050 DB vs. Calix Iberian 051 DB vs. Drake Starfire 052 DB vs. Tyron Kesh 053 DB vs. Corell Fedt 054 DB vs. JCT 055 DB vs. Vexatus 056 DB vs. Kadrol Hauen 057 DB vs. Xanos Zorrixor 058 DB vs. Arvalis Raith 059 DB vs. Kadrol Hauen 060 DB vs. Kromtal Bloodfyre Romanae 061 DB vs. Andrelious J. Mimosa-Inahj 062 DB vs. AnthonyH 063 DB vs. Hakatsuki 064 DB vs. Soren Leonis 065 DB vs. Magik 066 DB vs. Creon 067 DB vs. Hatchi Aso-Gui Sol-Corvo 068 DB vs. Andrelious J. Inahj 069 DB vs. Aru Law 070 DB vs. Esbelta Teresa Amaral 071 DB vs. Nora Olen di Plagia

DB vs Raidoner was the twenty-fourth case tried by the Chamber of Justice. The sitting Justicar was Kir Katarn, the Left Hand of Justice was Angelo Dante, and the Right Hand of Justice was Vladet Xavier.

Basic Case Information

Defendants Name

• Maximus Raidoner Mandalore

Charges

• Abuse of Power
• Disreputable Behavior

Verdict

• Case Dropped

Sentence

• Official Letter of Reprimand

Case Summary

This case stemmed from the Brotherhood's involvement in Star Wars Galaxies (SWG) through the Dark Brotherhood Player's Association(DBPA). The Justicar received several complaints that property which had been donated to the DBPA was missing. The Chamber of Justice launched an investigation and concluded that the missing property had been located in a "Guild Hall" which had been packed up and taken by Raidoner. The Chamber of Justice then proceeded to charge Raidoner for using his administrative access to steal DBPA property, which - as established in 006 DB vs. Gilkane - is considered theft from the Brotherhood itself. The trial was in the plea-phase when the Grand Master announced that the Player's Association had been dissolved. The Chamber discussed the issue and determined the case should be dropped, because the Chamber no longer had jurisdiction over SWG matters since the dissolution of DBPA. However, the Chamber agreed that Raidoner actions had been inappropriate, and therefore he was issued an Official Letter of Reprimand.

Related News Posts

Posted By Kir Katarn - 1/23/2008

Case Summary - #024 DB vs Raidoner

This case stemmed from the Brotherhood's involvement in Star Wars Galaxies (SWG) through the Dark Brotherhood Player's Association (DBPA). The Justicar received several complaints that property which had been donated to the DBPA was missing. The Chamber of Justice launched an investigation and concluded that the missing property had been located in a "Guild Hall" which had been packed up and taken by Raidoner.

The Chamber of Justice then proceeded to charge Raidoner with Abuse of Power and Disreputable Behavior for using his administrative access to steal DBPA property, which - as established in 006 DB vs. Gilkane - is considered theft from the Brotherhood itself. The trial was in the plea-phase when the Grand Master announced that the Player's Association had been dissolved. The Chamber discussed the issue and determined the case should be dropped, because the Chamber no longer had jurisdiction over SWG matters since the dissolution of DBPA. However, the Chamber agreed that Raidoner actions had been inappropriate, and therefore he was issued an Official Letter of Reprimand.

In addition, during the investigation phase of this trial the Chamber of Justice had several discussions with the former DBPA Tribune, Yeldarb Vohokou. After the case had concluded the Chamber reviewed his testimony and determined that he had acted inappropriately and had perjured himself in his testimony. He was also issued an Official Letter of Reprimand.

Justicar's Opinion

• No Justicar's Opinion was written for this case because it was not completed, full details are available in the Case Summary above.

Points of Interest

This case shared many issues with 006 DB vs. Gilkane, as both dealt with DBPA issues regarding Brotherhood property. Also this case and the issues surrounding it contributed to the closing of the DBPA.

In addition, during the investigation phase of this trial the Chamber of Justice had several discussions with the DBPA Tribune, Yeldarb Vohokou. After the case had concluded the Chamber reviewed his testimony and determined that he had acted inappropriately and had perjured himself in his testimony. He was also issued an Official Letter of Reprimand. This is most likely the first time anyone had been officially reprimanded for providing false statements to the Chamber of Justice.