CoJ Case 033

File:033 DB vs. Robin Hawk.png

This article is part of the series:

Chamber of Justice

Cases

001 DB vs. Blade 002 DB vs. Mirei 003 DB vs. Tiberius 004 DB vs. DarkWarchief 005 DB vs. Selket 006 DB vs. Gilkane 007 DB vs. Oberst 008 DB vs. Kromtal 009 DB vs. Halc 010 DB vs. Boba nil 011 DB vs. Dismal 012 DB vs. Tissaya 013 DB vs. Bane 014 DB vs. Ashura 015 DB vs. Tissaya 016 DB vs. Jaymz 017 DB vs. Cannabisia 018 DB vs. Khobai 019 DB vs. Ricco 020 DB vs. Ricco 021 DB vs. Cornix 022 DB vs. Drepo Mcarc 023 DB vs. Jason Hunter 024 DB vs. Raidoner 025 DB vs. Sashar 026 DB vs. Androc 027 DB vs. Krandon 028 DB vs. Braecen 029 DB vs. Jalek 030 DB vs. Arack 031 DB vs. Archangel 032 DB vs. Raidoner 033 DB vs. Robin Hawk 034 DB vs. Coop Ter-an 035 DB vs. Coop Ter-an 036 DB vs. Darkone 037 DB vs. Wuntila 038 DB vs. Fremoc Pepoi 039 DB vs. Solus Gar 040 DB vs. Arden Karn 041 DB vs. Ronovi Tavisaen 042 DB vs. Delak Krennel 043 DB vs. Rayna Krennel 044 DB vs. Darkblade 045 DB vs. Chizz 046 DB vs. Shorurra 047 DB vs. Turel Sorenn 048 DB vs. Nicolai "Rod" Rodell 049 DB vs. Seraphol Ceartas 050 DB vs. Calix Iberian 051 DB vs. Drake Starfire 052 DB vs. Tyron Kesh 053 DB vs. Corell Fedt 054 DB vs. JCT 055 DB vs. Vexatus 056 DB vs. Kadrol Hauen 057 DB vs. Xanos Zorrixor 058 DB vs. Arvalis Raith 059 DB vs. Kadrol Hauen 060 DB vs. Kromtal Bloodfyre Romanae 061 DB vs. Andrelious J. Mimosa-Inahj 062 DB vs. AnthonyH 063 DB vs. Hakatsuki 064 DB vs. Soren Leonis 065 DB vs. Magik 066 DB vs. Creon 067 DB vs. Hatchi Aso-Gui Sol-Corvo 068 DB vs. Andrelious J. Inahj 069 DB vs. Aru Law 070 DB vs. Esbelta Teresa Amaral 071 DB vs. Nora Olen di Plagia

DB vs Robin Hawk was the thirty-third case tried by the Chamber of Justice. The sitting Justicar was Kir Katarn, the Left Hand of Justice was Brujah, and the Right Hand of Justice was Angelo Dante. However, RHoJ Angelo Dante recused himself from this case due a prior relationship with the defendant, and was therefore replaced by former Hand of Justice and Dark Councilor Halcyon Taldrya.

Basic Case Information

Defendants Name

• Robin Hawk

Charges

• Harassment
• Disreputable Behavior

Verdict

• Guilty on all counts

Sentence

• Demoted to rank of Dark Jedi Knight
• Official Letter of Reprimand
• One Year Probation

Case Summary

Several members of the Brotherhood, having become frustrated with Robin's behavior, had asked her to cease contacting them in the future. Unfortunately, Robin refused to abide by these requests, and continued to contact these members, in one case even attempting to extend contact to their spouse. These events generated complaints which were brought to the Justicar, leading to Robin receiving several warnings, followed by an Official Letter of Reprimand, serving as an official warning to cease all contact and inappropriate behavior. Soon thereafter, Robin attempted to contact the spouse of a Brotherhood member again, violating these warnings. The Chamber of Justice then charged her with Harassment and Disreputable Behavior. Robin plead not guilty, and her case was taken to a trial by jury. The prosecution and defense authored their respective arguments, which were then sent to the jury. The jury deliberated, and then unanimously decided that Robin was guilty of all the charges against her. Due to the seriousness of her offenses, and her past history of ignoring reprimand and punishment, she was given a harsh sentence to act as a deterrent to future misbehavior.

Related News Posts

Posted By DP Kir Katarn - 12/1/2010 Chamber of Justice Communique #032a On this day, December 1, 2010 of the Liberated Brotherhood, I the Justicar of the Brotherhood now announce the punishment that this Chamber lays upon Robin Hawk d'Tana. Upon the conclusion of fair and just proceedings, a jury of your peers finds you: On the Charge of Harassment -

You did willfully and knowingly harass several members of the Brotherhood, and the spouse of a member, who is not a Brotherhood member. Your persistent torment continued after requests to cease contact by these members, after official warnings, and even after you received a final warning and Official Letter of Reprimand from the Chamber of Justice.

The jury finds you GUILTY. On the Charge of Disreputable Behavior -

You did willfully and knowingly bring onto yourself and the Brotherhood disrepute, by using a relationship established within the Brotherhood to inappropriately gain access to, and persistently harass, a non-club member.

The jury finds you GUILTY. Sentencing for the party is as follows:

Demotion from Sith Battlemaster to Dark Jedi Knight

Official Letter of Reprimand

One year of Probation The terms of probation are thus:

-The guilty party may not receive promotion, appointment to position, or any citation or honor of merit without the explicit permission of the Justicar

-The guily party may not have any further contact with she members she has been found guilty of harassing without the explicit permission of the Justicar

Justicar's Opinion

Posted By DP Kir Katarn - 12/1/2010 Justicar's Opinion - 032 DB vs. Robin Hawk This case was an extension of behavioral issues with the defendant reaching back more than a year. Before this case had even begun, the defendant had already been warned multiple times both executively and judicially, and removed from multiple leadership positions as reprimands by leaders all the way up to the Grand Master. Over the past several months, the Justicar had received multiple complaints regarding unwanted contact between the defendant and several Brotherhood members. These members had requested the defendant cease contacting them, but she had ignored these requests. The Chamber of Justice warned the defendant to stop, yet she did not desist. Finally, after the defendant attempted to contact the spouse of a Brotherhood member with the intent to cause marital difficulties, the Chamber of Justice issued the defendant an Official Letter of Reprimand. This reprimand and final warning instructed the defendant to cease her grossly inappropriate behavior, and notified her that further issues would result in prosecution. Soon thereafter, the Justicar was brought another complaint, indicating the defendant had attempted to contact the spouse of a Brotherhood member yet again. This was a clear violation of the final warning she received in the Official Letter of Reprimand. The Chamber determined that charges must now be brought against the defendant. The defendant was notified of the charges against her, being Harassment and Disreputable Behavior, and she plead not guilty. A jury of six members was then randomly assembled as required by the Dark Covenant, and the prosecution and defense both submitted their arguments. These arguments were examined by the jury, and they deliberated the merits of the arguments before voting unanimously that the defendant was guilty of all charges. The sentencing phase then began and the Justicar had to determine the most appropriate punishment for the defendant. The defendant's full record of inappropriate behavior was taken into account, as was the fact that prior punishments and reprimands had not had the desired effect, as the defendant continued to violate the Covenant. In addition, a serious matter in this case was the fact that the defendant had gone beyond the Brotherhood to persistently harass the spouse of a member (who is not herself involved with the organization). This is a very serious concern, as our members have a right privacy for themselves and their family members, and do not expect their membership in the Brotherhood to be a threat to those rights. Therefore, the Justicar determined the sentence must be appropriately harsh. Thus the defendant was demoted two ranks from Battlemaster to Dark Jedi Knight, given another Letter of Reprimand, and put on probation for an entire year. All members of the Brotherhood join our organization with the expectation they will be provided with a fun and safe environment. While all of our members are granted a right to free speech, the Dark Covenant specifically stipulates that they must exercise that freedom while “...having respect for and protecting the rights of other members.” Persistent harassment destroys the safety of the environment we have created for our members, and the Chamber of Justice must act in all of these cases.

Points of Interest

This was only the second case in the history of the Chamber of Justice to have a Hand of Justice recuse himself. The first was 009 DB vs. Halc, the case which prompted the Chamber to create a Recusal rule.