|
|
| Line 58: |
Line 58: |
|
| |
|
| {{clear}} | | {{clear}} |
|
| |
|
| |
| === [[Jades "Imperial" Atema]] ===
| |
| [[Image:Jade avatar wiki.jpg|left|165px]] '''Nominated by:''' --[[User:Tyrenzin|Tyren Atema]] 13:17, 1 February 2009 (CET)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - This article is well written, easy to read, and has enough pictures that it doesn't become boring. -- [[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 09:27, 2 February 2009 (MST)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' It's a nice article. I would like to see more links, though. (By the way, is the name supposed to be "Jade" or "Jade'''s'''"?) --[[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 14:10, 8 February 2009 (MST)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' Very nice job. --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 19:35, 21 February 2009 (MST)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - I like it. Definetly a nice article. --[[User:Anubis Wrath|Anubis]] 15:11, 27 February 2009 (MST)
| |
| {{clear}}
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| === [[Lyspair]] === | | === [[Lyspair]] === |
| Line 93: |
Line 79: |
| {{clear}} | | {{clear}} |
|
| |
|
| === [[Entar]] ===
| |
|
| |
| [[Image:Entar_Family.jpeg|left|200px]] '''Nominated by:''' [[User:Xathia|Xathia]] 18:42, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - The image is a little strange, but I think that the article is very well written. It might be a tad low on pictures, but I think there are enough to have a quality article. I like it a lot. ~ [[User:Legorii|Legz]] 18:46, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - Sparse on images, but what the heck: I like the writing and the images present are top notch. [[User:Timeros|Timeros]] 18:48, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - Indeed a little low on images, but you don't really miss them. Other than that, very good writing and wel structured. [[User:Strategos|Strategos]] 19:01, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - Very nice article. The content and formatting looks like a good bit of thought and effort went into this. Less images than many articles, which I personally liked. [[User:Malidir|Malidir]] 20:13, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
| '''Support''' - Excellent article. Concise, well written, not overly verbose and the pictures gave it the flare needed to beat out the competition and set the suitably high standards of a wiki featured article. Well done. --[[User:Sashar|Sashar]] 20:47, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| <!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category--> | | <!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category--> |
| [[Category:DJB Help]] | | [[Category:DJB Help]] |
Revision as of 04:33, 12 March 2009
The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.
So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.
An article must…
- …be well written and detailed
- …be unbiased, non-point of view
- …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
- …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
- …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
- …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
- …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
- …not have been previously featured
For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.
How to nominate:
- First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
- Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
- Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
- The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
- Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".
How to vote:
- Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
- Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
- If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
- As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
- Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
Also remember to add {{nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
Every month the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.
Featured article nominations
List an article and leave your signature for the nomination(s) - additional comments beyond support or object (unless you have concrete reasons as to why you object) are not required and will be deleted.
Nominated by: --Anubis 20:19, 9 November 2008 (MST)
Support - Good article. My only possible objection would be that it seems a little cluttered and in-your-face, but that's a stylistic difference more than anything. Good pictures and detail, no real problems I can identify. ~ Legorii 20:26, 9 November 2008 (MST)
Weak Object - I dunno, something's missing in my opinion. The images could use work along with formatting. Content is good though. ~ Macron 12:33, 11 November 2008 (EST)
Object - One section has "coming soon", which means this article isn't complete. I also think a couple more images are needed in the last half of the article to break up all the text--Halcyon 18:23, 22 November 2008 (MST)
Weak Support I think the article is now complete, but the section "The Final Mark" is a story. Try to refrain from stories (i.e. dialogue and tons of descriptions) and make it more of an informational article. --RevengeX Palpatine 14:18, 24 December 2008 (MST)
Nominated by: --Aabs 20:17, 21 February 2009 (MST)
Support Excellent piece of SA history. --Taigikori Aybara 20:44, 21 February 2009 (MST)
Support - Nice job, great article. --Anubis 15:11, 27 February 2009 (MST)
Object It's too short and doesn't have enough images. --RevengeX Palpatine 19:31, 27 February 2009 (MST)
Object I agree, it is far too short and too few on detail, images, etc. --Kir Katarn 13:49, 6 March 2009 (MST)
Nominated by: -- Alaris 15:03, 11 March 2009 (MDT)
Object There is a grammar error or two in the article summary at the top, that would be displayed on the main page should the article be featured. That's a no-no. The formatting is a little strange around the images, those large spaces are unattractive. My only other objection, then, would be the long list of all of RH's promotions. This is not a dossier, and I don't like when people list things like that on their wikis. Fix these things up and I'll support it. ~ Legz 15:20, 11 March 2009 (MDT)