DJBWiki:Featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
mNo edit summary
Line 81: Line 81:
*'''Support''' - Great article, very detailed --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
*'''Support''' - Great article, very detailed --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 11:43, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
*'''Support''' - Great article. Veery well done. --[[User:Dismal|Dismal]] 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
*'''Support''' - Great article. Veery well done. --[[User:Dismal|Dismal]] 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
*'''Support''' - Awesome article. Lots of detail, gives a professional air to the team. - [[Xayun]]


<!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category-->
<!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category-->
[[Category:DJBWiki|Featured Articles]]
[[Category:DJBWiki|Featured Articles]]
{{clear}}
{{clear}}

Revision as of 21:30, 11 July 2007

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.


An article must…

  1. …be well written and detailed
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view
  3. …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
  4. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
  5. …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
  6. …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
  7. …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
  8. …not have been previously featured

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.


How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add {{nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Featured article nominations

List an article and leave your signature for the nomination(s) - additional comments beyond support or object (unless you have concrete reasons as to why you object) are not required and will be deleted.

Aabsdu

Nominated by --Tron 17:35, 13 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)

  • Weak Support - Vladimir 09:12, 27 February 2007 (MST)
  • Weak Support - Macron- needs a lead pic- 23;56, 7 mar 07 (EST)
  • Weak Support - Without a character pic it's just not "complete" 21:14, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Support - Solid article. Image unnecessary to visualize the detail given. - Oberst 00:54, 28 March 2007 (MDT)
    • Needs a pic. It's a requirement for Featured Articles. 16:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
    • Pic is being made, at least so I'm told. In case anyone cares. Btw, thanks for the compliment Oberst, heh Aabs 20:18, 11 April 2007 (MDT)


Drodik Va'lence al'Tor

File:Drodik.jpg

Nominated by --Drodik 07:21, 20 February 2007 (Central Standard Time)

  • Weak Support - Vladimir 09:17, 27 February 2007 (MST)
  • Support - Nice article and an interesting read, but could do with fleshing out at the end as it sort of trails off - Kieran 22:17, 16 April 2007 (GMT)
  • Weak Support Aabs 11:40, 20 April 2007 (MDT)


Crimson Tide

Nominated By - Dismal 22:27, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

  • Weak Support - It's a well-written article, however, is there anyway you can add more links? Without the blue text, it looks kind of "boring." -- RevengeX Palpatine 05:49, 30 June 2007 (MDT)


Soulfire Strike Team

Nominated By - Kieran 20:53, 10 July 2007 (GMT)

  • Support - There are a few spelling mistakes scattered throughout the article, but the content makes up for it by a lot. Excellent work, folks. :) -- RevengeX Palpatine 14:04, 10 July 2007 (MDT)
  • Support - Great article, very detailed --Aabs 11:43, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
  • Support - Great article. Veery well done. --Dismal 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
  • Support - Awesome article. Lots of detail, gives a professional air to the team. - Xayun