|
|
| Line 82: |
Line 82: |
| *'''Support''' - Great article. Veery well done. --[[User:Dismal|Dismal]] 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT) | | *'''Support''' - Great article. Veery well done. --[[User:Dismal|Dismal]] 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT) |
| *'''Support''' - Awesome article. Lots of detail, gives a professional air to the team. - [[Xayun]] | | *'''Support''' - Awesome article. Lots of detail, gives a professional air to the team. - [[Xayun]] |
| | *'''Weak Support''' - It's alright, a bit overkill on some stuff. Still, you can't knock it. -[[User:Ashura Isradia|Ashura]] |
| {{clear}} | | {{clear}} |
|
| |
|
Revision as of 13:48, 24 July 2007
The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.
So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.
An article must…
- …be well written and detailed
- …be unbiased, non-point of view
- …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
- …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
- …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
- …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
- …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
- …not have been previously featured
For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.
How to nominate:
- First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
- Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
- Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
- The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
- Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".
How to vote:
- Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
- Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
- If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
- As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
- Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
Also remember to add {{nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.
Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.
Featured article nominations
List an article and leave your signature for the nomination(s) - additional comments beyond support or object (unless you have concrete reasons as to why you object) are not required and will be deleted.
Nominated by --Tron 17:35, 13 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
- Weak Support - Vladimir 09:12, 27 February 2007 (MST)
- Weak Support - Macron- needs a lead pic- 23;56, 7 mar 07 (EST)
- Weak Support - Without a character pic it's just not "complete"
21:14, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
- Support - Solid article. Image unnecessary to visualize the detail given. - Oberst 00:54, 28 March 2007 (MDT)
- Needs a pic. It's a requirement for Featured Articles. 16:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Pic is being made, at least so I'm told. In case anyone cares. Btw, thanks for the compliment Oberst, heh Aabs 20:18, 11 April 2007 (MDT)
File:Drodik.jpg
Nominated by --Drodik 07:21, 20 February 2007 (Central Standard Time)
- Weak Support - Vladimir 09:17, 27 February 2007 (MST)
- Support - Nice article and an interesting read, but could do with fleshing out at the end as it sort of trails off - Kieran 22:17, 16 April 2007 (GMT)
- Weak Support Aabs 11:40, 20 April 2007 (MDT)
Nominated By - Dismal 22:27, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
- Weak Support - It's a well-written article, however, is there anyway you can add more links? Without the blue text, it looks kind of "boring." -- RevengeX Palpatine 05:49, 30 June 2007 (MDT)
Nominated By - Kieran 20:53, 10 July 2007 (GMT)
- Support - There are a few spelling mistakes scattered throughout the article, but the content makes up for it by a lot. Excellent work, folks. :) -- RevengeX Palpatine 14:04, 10 July 2007 (MDT) <- I can't pick any out, but I think you're confusing the correct English spelling of our language with your pig latin American dialect :P -Kier
- Support - Great article, very detailed --Aabs 11:43, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
- Support - Great article. Veery well done. --Dismal 13:04, 11 July 2007 (MDT)
- Support - Awesome article. Lots of detail, gives a professional air to the team. - Xayun
- Weak Support - It's alright, a bit overkill on some stuff. Still, you can't knock it. -Ashura
Nominated By - RevengeX Palpatine 15:06, 12 July 2007 (MDT) (I'm mainly just looking for feedback.)
- Support - Well written, neatly organized, and with good images. --Dismal 23:11, 12 July 2007 (MDT)
- Support - Concise, well organized, good imagery. --Macron 15:11, 14 July 2007 (EST)