Talk:Maximus Raidoner Mandalore: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
Raidoner was a member of the Dark Summit for several years and had in-character interactions with several prominent people and places.  I'm aware of several interactions of historic note regarding House Marka Ragnos of Naga Sadow, and he was in that unit very briefly compared to his time in CSP.  In the past, we've kept character pages up not only for the 'end of the story' as it were, but also because destruction of the content is unnecessary.  We're not running out of disk space.  I don't know why Bane's was treated differently. Obviously, it'd be nicer if the content here was tidied up, but it about as low on the priority list as possible.  --[[image:muz.png]] 01:30 17 September 2011 (EST)
Raidoner was a member of the Dark Summit for several years and had in-character interactions with several prominent people and places.  I'm aware of several interactions of historic note regarding House Marka Ragnos of Naga Sadow, and he was in that unit very briefly compared to his time in CSP.  In the past, we've kept character pages up not only for the 'end of the story' as it were, but also because destruction of the content is unnecessary.  We're not running out of disk space.  I don't know why Bane's was treated differently. Obviously, it'd be nicer if the content here was tidied up, but it about as low on the priority list as possible.  --[[image:muz.png]] 01:30 17 September 2011 (EST)


So with that logic, out of curiosity...why was the Bane article removed? -- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 17 September 2011 05:55 (UTC)
So out of curiosity...is there any way the Bane article can be recovered? -- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 17 September 2011 05:55 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:56, 17 September 2011

Fix the infobox information (fill it in, for one). Work on the content itself. Then, in the box at the bottom you state your SWG Tribune reign as starting at 29 ABY, when that year hasn't even happened yet :P Aabs 17:31, 21 April 2007 (MDT)

that, and using a game-screenshot as a portrait won't work. also, you were assigned as Guild Leader:PA on 2/16/2005, which is not even two and a half years, and not 'almost three years'.--Korras 15:49, 8 June 2007 (MDT)

Status of this Article?

I was wondering if there were any plans to update this page or remove it. I know that Bane's article was first updated with CoJ information, but then his wiki article was entirely removed. Is that going to be the same for this one? - Ronovi Tavisaen 05:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

As far as i know, this article was kept with similar reason as to why RH's and Cado's articles were kept instead of deleting them. Fremoc, Fist of the Brotherhood 05:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

People have this nasty habit of writing plot fiction about the "deaths" of removed members. Then, to avoid plot holes and confusion, we have to keep those characters around. But in Raid's case, I don't think there was anything (can someone from SP confirm there was no really important house fiction about him?). There isn't a whole lot that links to the character article, and those that do are more about the member than the character. Ideally, I'd like to remove the character parts, and if we leave anything behind just a short blurb about how he was SWG Tribune, blah blah blah, see these CoJ cases for more info. --Benevolent Whiner (talk - dossier) 16:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Raidoner was a member of the Dark Summit for several years and had in-character interactions with several prominent people and places. I'm aware of several interactions of historic note regarding House Marka Ragnos of Naga Sadow, and he was in that unit very briefly compared to his time in CSP. In the past, we've kept character pages up not only for the 'end of the story' as it were, but also because destruction of the content is unnecessary. We're not running out of disk space. I don't know why Bane's was treated differently. Obviously, it'd be nicer if the content here was tidied up, but it about as low on the priority list as possible. -- 01:30 17 September 2011 (EST)

So out of curiosity...is there any way the Bane article can be recovered? -- Ronovi Tavisaen 17 September 2011 05:55 (UTC)