|
|
Line 79: |
Line 79: |
| [[File:Ddf.jpg|thumb|left|150px]] '''Nominated by:''' --[[User:Meleu Karthdo|Meleu Karthdo]] ([[User talk:Meleu Karthdo|talk]]) 20:32, 1 September 2014 (EDT) | | [[File:Ddf.jpg|thumb|left|150px]] '''Nominated by:''' --[[User:Meleu Karthdo|Meleu Karthdo]] ([[User talk:Meleu Karthdo|talk]]) 20:32, 1 September 2014 (EDT) |
| [[Category:DJB Help]] | | [[Category:DJB Help]] |
| | |
| | * '''Object:''' While informative, this page is basically no more than a large, point-form list of ship types and names. There is little actual content written with this type of page as it's merely meant to provide background details. When compared to other Featured Articles, which involve a great deal more fiction-writing effort and creativity, I feel this is not the style of page made to be a Featured Article. Furthermore, while it doesn't really matter due to my previous comments, the page is not yet complete as the Naval portion still says "forthcoming". This alone would disqualify the article from being Featured. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] ([[User talk:Shadow Taldrya|talk]]) 01:08, 8 September 2014 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:08, 8 September 2014
The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.
So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.
An article must…
- …be well written and detailed
- …be unbiased, non-point of view
- …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
- …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
- …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
- …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
- …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
- …not have been previously featured
For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.
How to nominate:
- First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
- Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
- Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
- The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
- Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".
How to vote:
- Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
- Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
- If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
- As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
- Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
Also remember to add {{Nominated}}
at the top of the article you are nominating.
Every month the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with a Featured icon and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{Featured article}}
template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.
Featured article nominations
List an article and leave your signature (--~~~~) for the nomination(s). Please use the format below for your nominations/showing support or objection.
Nominating:
=== [[Article Name]] ===
[[File:Infobox-Picture.jpg|thumb|left|150px]] '''Nominated by:''' --~~~~
Showing support or objecting:
* '''Strong Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing strong support --~~~~
* '''Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing support --~~~~
* '''Weak Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing weak support --~~~~
* '''Strong Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are strongly objecting --~~~~
* '''Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are objecting --~~~~
* '''Weak Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are weakly objecting --~~~~
{{Clear}}
Nominates by: --Shadow Taldrya 15:30, 5 May 2014 (MDT)
- Support --Mav 15:35, 5 May 2014 (MDT)
- Strong Support --Howlader 14:37, 11 May 2014 (MDT)
- Support Dark Jedi Constantine is a wonderful idea --Halcyon 17:14, 11 May 2014 (MDT)
- Support --Aabs (talk)
Nominated by: --(Yacks) 16:47, 19 April 2014 (MDT)
- Support: Well written character biography.--(Yacks) 16:47, 19 April 2014 (MDT)
- Object Needs a better summary to be added to the main page. --Shadow Taldrya 17:02, 19 April 2014 (MDT)
- Support --Halcyon 07:19, 21 April 2014 (MDT)
- Support --Howlader 23:26, 22 April 2014 (MDT)
- Weak Object The summary should be expanded a bit more Kaz 10:30, 26 April 2014 (MDT)
- Object: Better summary (including formatting). --Legz (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2014 (EDT)
Nominated by: --Meleu Karthdo (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2014 (EDT)
- Object: While informative, this page is basically no more than a large, point-form list of ship types and names. There is little actual content written with this type of page as it's merely meant to provide background details. When compared to other Featured Articles, which involve a great deal more fiction-writing effort and creativity, I feel this is not the style of page made to be a Featured Article. Furthermore, while it doesn't really matter due to my previous comments, the page is not yet complete as the Naval portion still says "forthcoming". This alone would disqualify the article from being Featured. --Shadow Taldrya (talk) 01:08, 8 September 2014 (EDT)