|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| == Status of this Article? == | | == Status of this Article? == |
|
| |
|
| I was wondering if there were any plans to update this page or remove it. I know that Bane's article was first updated with CoJ information, but then his wiki article was entirely removed. Is that going to be the same for this one? - {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 14 September 2011, 05:50 (UTC) | | I was wondering if there were any plans to update this page or remove it. I know that Bane's article was first updated with CoJ information, but then his wiki article was entirely removed. Is that going to be the same for this one? - {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 05:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| As far as i know, this article was kept with similar reason as to why RH's and Cado's articles were kept instead of deleting them. [[User:Fremoc|Fremoc]], [[Fist of the Brotherhood]] 05:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC) | | As far as i know, this article was kept with similar reason as to why RH's and Cado's articles were kept instead of deleting them. [[User:Fremoc|Fremoc]], [[Fist of the Brotherhood]] 05:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| People have this nasty habit of writing plot fiction about the "deaths" of removed members. Then, to avoid plot holes and confusion, we have to keep those characters around. But in Raid's case, I don't ''think'' there was anything (can someone from [[Scholae Palatinae|SP]] confirm there was no really important house fiction about him?). There isn't a whole lot that [http://wiki.darkjedibrotherhood.com/view/Special:WhatLinksHere/Maximus_Raidoner_Mandalore links] to the character article, and those that do are more about the member than the character. Ideally, I'd like to remove the character parts, and if we leave anything behind just a short blurb about how he was SWG Tribune, blah blah blah, see these CoJ cases for more info. --[[User:BenevolentWhiner|Benevolent Whiner]] <small>([[User talk:BenevolentWhiner|talk]] - [[dossier:2706|dossier]])</small> 16:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC) | | People have this nasty habit of writing plot fiction about the "deaths" of removed members. Then, to avoid plot holes and confusion, we have to keep those characters around. But in Raid's case, I don't ''think'' there was anything (can someone from [[Scholae Palatinae|SP]] confirm there was no really important house fiction about him?). There isn't a whole lot that [http://wiki.darkjedibrotherhood.com/view/Special:WhatLinksHere/Maximus_Raidoner_Mandalore links] to the character article, and those that do are more about the member than the character. Ideally, I'd like to remove the character parts, and if we leave anything behind just a short blurb about how he was SWG Tribune, blah blah blah, see these CoJ cases for more info. --[[User:BenevolentWhiner|Benevolent Whiner]] <small>([[User talk:BenevolentWhiner|talk]] - [[dossier:2706|dossier]])</small> 16:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC) |
| | |
| | Keep in mind, Raidoner was an expulsion case, and Hawk and Cado were not. Bane's article was removed, so I thought maybe, since Raidoner was expelled, we may as well do the same justice: Remove his article and redirect his name to the CoJ page. -- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 01:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:24, 16 September 2011
Fix the infobox information (fill it in, for one). Work on the content itself. Then, in the box at the bottom you state your SWG Tribune reign as starting at 29 ABY, when that year hasn't even happened yet :P Aabs 17:31, 21 April 2007 (MDT)
that, and using a game-screenshot as a portrait won't work. also, you were assigned as Guild Leader:PA on 2/16/2005, which is not even two and a half years, and not 'almost three years'.--Korras 15:49, 8 June 2007 (MDT)
Status of this Article?
I was wondering if there were any plans to update this page or remove it. I know that Bane's article was first updated with CoJ information, but then his wiki article was entirely removed. Is that going to be the same for this one? - Ronovi Tavisaen 05:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
As far as i know, this article was kept with similar reason as to why RH's and Cado's articles were kept instead of deleting them. Fremoc, Fist of the Brotherhood 05:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
People have this nasty habit of writing plot fiction about the "deaths" of removed members. Then, to avoid plot holes and confusion, we have to keep those characters around. But in Raid's case, I don't think there was anything (can someone from SP confirm there was no really important house fiction about him?). There isn't a whole lot that links to the character article, and those that do are more about the member than the character. Ideally, I'd like to remove the character parts, and if we leave anything behind just a short blurb about how he was SWG Tribune, blah blah blah, see these CoJ cases for more info. --Benevolent Whiner (talk - dossier) 16:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep in mind, Raidoner was an expulsion case, and Hawk and Cado were not. Bane's article was removed, so I thought maybe, since Raidoner was expelled, we may as well do the same justice: Remove his article and redirect his name to the CoJ page. -- Ronovi Tavisaen 01:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)