|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| *I'm inclined to disagree; mostly because merging those infoboxes in here would make this page really long, and probably look even more barren. The text for those planets comes nowhere near the length for the boxes, so you'll end up with big empty areas. This page is in need of ''something'' though. At the very least, make those "Orbit n" titles a subtitle of something else, so you don't get the horizontal line in between orbits. --[[User:BenevolentWhiner|BenevolentWhiner]] 17:12, 12 June 2007 (MDT) | | *I'm inclined to disagree; mostly because merging those infoboxes in here would make this page really long, and probably look even more barren. The text for those planets comes nowhere near the length for the boxes, so you'll end up with big empty areas. This page is in need of ''something'' though. At the very least, make those "Orbit n" titles a subtitle of something else, so you don't get the horizontal line in between orbits. --[[User:BenevolentWhiner|BenevolentWhiner]] 17:12, 12 June 2007 (MDT) |
| | |
| | *Actually, after I posted my last opinion and was categorizing articles I realize that I agree with Ben, more or less. Don't merge them, but you do need to put little paragraphs or something here. What I'm thinking of is like the [[Jusadih System]] and [[Acarr System]] articles. Also, I really see no reason for articles for all those moons, just planets :P --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 22:24, 12 June 2007 (MDT) |
Revision as of 04:24, 13 June 2007
Merge?
- Is there any valid reason on why there are separate pages for each planet when the system page is nearly blank?
This seems like a complete waste of resources. I say merge all the individual planet pages into this one system page. -- KM
- I would have to agree. The planet pages themselves have small amounts of information, and this page here is just a big list.--Aabs 16:51, 12 June 2007 (MDT)
- I'm inclined to disagree; mostly because merging those infoboxes in here would make this page really long, and probably look even more barren. The text for those planets comes nowhere near the length for the boxes, so you'll end up with big empty areas. This page is in need of something though. At the very least, make those "Orbit n" titles a subtitle of something else, so you don't get the horizontal line in between orbits. --BenevolentWhiner 17:12, 12 June 2007 (MDT)
- Actually, after I posted my last opinion and was categorizing articles I realize that I agree with Ben, more or less. Don't merge them, but you do need to put little paragraphs or something here. What I'm thinking of is like the Jusadih System and Acarr System articles. Also, I really see no reason for articles for all those moons, just planets :P --Aabs 22:24, 12 June 2007 (MDT)