Talk:MAAT/SOC Gunship: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
(import from google cache)
m (html)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{HTML}}
== Justification ==
== Justification ==
I hope you can find some way to justify the development of this kind of ship. --[[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 16:06, 31 October 2008 (MDT)
I hope you can find some way to justify the development of this kind of ship. --[[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 16:06, 31 October 2008 (MDT)

Revision as of 22:54, 7 October 2014

You've got the wrong table!
This article or template is using HTML tables rather than wiki markup.
Please convert any HTML into wiki markup before removing this tag.

Justification

I hope you can find some way to justify the development of this kind of ship. --RevengeX Palpatine 16:06, 31 October 2008 (MDT)

The regular LAAT/I gunships have been considered "Ground Forces" before and are listed on the Military Possessions Record for Clans Arcona and Taldryan. I know there was talk before about just dissolving these lists of ground forces since it really should be left up to the Clans, as long as they are realistic with numbers and types of course. Would be good to hear if that's still on the table anywhere one way or another. --Duga Taldrya Arkarso 14:03, 1 November 2008 (MDT)

This is going to be produced by our clan on Caina by the Petitor Umbrarum Corporation. Blade has already done some artwork for, and I'll be adding to this article. It has been approved by CSP's War Council due to the fact we didn't have an IC way to get troopers from the ships to the surface. As it doesn't have hyperdrive and is under the "ground forces," then it doesn't count against our fighter/ship count since it won't be involved in combat with cap ships/anti-fighters. -- Dante 20:58, 1 NOvember 2008 (CST)


Links

Archangel - Never Tempt the Mighty

TALK - 21:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Added a bunch of links. If there are enough, please remove Linkless tag. Thanks!

-->