DJBWiki:Featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:


'''Support''' - The content is good and it's a nice read. --[[User: Robert Daragon|Bob]]
'''Support''' - The content is good and it's a nice read. --[[User: Robert Daragon|Bob]]
'''Support''' - I wholeheartedly agree with Ashura and Talos. Not only is Anubis' wiki well written, but it is also something that he puts a large amount of time and effort into. --[[User: Zasati Tryezsh|Zasati]]


<!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category-->
<!---DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE, as it is for the category-->
[[Category:DJB Help]]
[[Category:DJB Help]]

Revision as of 01:21, 16 May 2008

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.


An article must…

  1. …be well written and detailed
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view
  3. …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
  4. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
  5. …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
  6. …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
  7. …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
  8. …not have been previously featured

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.


How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add {{nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Featured article nominations

List an article and leave your signature for the nomination(s) - additional comments beyond support or object (unless you have concrete reasons as to why you object) are not required and will be deleted.

Anubis Annedu

--Anubis 06:13, 15 May 2008 (MDT)

Support - I like the history, it's a lot more grounded than anything you previouslly had. I do see a lot hyperlinks that arent needed which a [[tag]] could be used instead. I suggest you go through and clean up any tag errors, as I saw a few. All in all, it's good. --Ashura 13:27 (GMT), 15 May 2008

Support - I agree with Ashura. Anubis is a great writer and it is displayed through his wiki. I personally think that this history is better than the ones before, even when we were brothers. --Talos

Support - The content is good and it's a nice read. --Bob

Support - I wholeheartedly agree with Ashura and Talos. Not only is Anubis' wiki well written, but it is also something that he puts a large amount of time and effort into. --Zasati