|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
| |
|
| Is RL Discrimination and Prejudice classed as Vandalism? The current quote of the day defines an entire culture in a gross and insulting sexual manner. Quote of the day is supposed to be a funny thing, as I understand it, but the current one is just sick and in poor taste. [[User:Impetus|Impie]] 12:42, 3 March 2008 (MST) | | Is RL Discrimination and Prejudice classed as Vandalism? The current quote of the day defines an entire culture in a gross and insulting sexual manner. Quote of the day is supposed to be a funny thing, as I understand it, but the current one is just sick and in poor taste. [[User:Impetus|Impie]] 12:42, 3 March 2008 (MST) |
| | |
| | *From the Third Edition of Black's Law Dictionary: |
| | '''vandalism''', ''n.'' 1. Willful or ignorant destruction of public or private property, esp. of artistic, architectural, or literary treasures. 2. The actions or attitudes of one who maliciously or ignorantly destroys or disfigures public or private property; active hostility to anything that is venerable or beautiful." |
| | |
| | I would be hesitant to apply the requisite intent needed for the crime of vandalism to this particular situation, since the quote obviously was not intended to destroy/damage the Wiki itself. Of course that's only my opinion ... [[User:Vladimir|Vladimir]] 13:48, 3 March 2008 (MST) |
Revision as of 20:48, 3 March 2008
This page needs to be revised. -- Kaine Mandaala 14:25, 4 May 2007 (MDT)
Aye, it sounds really ugly. I'll work on making it sound better --Aabs 22:45, 13 October 2007 (MDT)
RL References
Is RL Discrimination and Prejudice classed as Vandalism? The current quote of the day defines an entire culture in a gross and insulting sexual manner. Quote of the day is supposed to be a funny thing, as I understand it, but the current one is just sick and in poor taste. Impie 12:42, 3 March 2008 (MST)
- From the Third Edition of Black's Law Dictionary:
vandalism, n. 1. Willful or ignorant destruction of public or private property, esp. of artistic, architectural, or literary treasures. 2. The actions or attitudes of one who maliciously or ignorantly destroys or disfigures public or private property; active hostility to anything that is venerable or beautiful."
I would be hesitant to apply the requisite intent needed for the crime of vandalism to this particular situation, since the quote obviously was not intended to destroy/damage the Wiki itself. Of course that's only my opinion ... Vladimir 13:48, 3 March 2008 (MST)