|
|
Line 62: |
Line 62: |
| *'''Support''' - Updated a few formating issues, but otherwise it's a good article. -[[User:Solus Gar|Solus Gar]] 23:19, 31 October 2012 (MDT) | | *'''Support''' - Updated a few formating issues, but otherwise it's a good article. -[[User:Solus Gar|Solus Gar]] 23:19, 31 October 2012 (MDT) |
| * '''Support''' - Is it tacky to support myself? One year of work, routinely working. Not to say that I'm proud of my work, but I'm proud of my work. --[[User:Eiko|Eiko]] 22:27, 1 November 2012 (MDT) | | * '''Support''' - Is it tacky to support myself? One year of work, routinely working. Not to say that I'm proud of my work, but I'm proud of my work. --[[User:Eiko|Eiko]] 22:27, 1 November 2012 (MDT) |
| | * '''Support''' - This article is well designed, easy to read, and informative. -[[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 23:27, 2 November 2012 (MDT) |
|
| |
|
| {{Clear}} | | {{Clear}} |
Revision as of 05:27, 3 November 2012
The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.
So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.
An article must…
- …be well written and detailed
- …be unbiased, non-point of view
- …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
- …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
- …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
- …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
- …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
- …not have been previously featured
For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.
How to nominate:
- First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
- Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
- Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
- The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
- Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".
How to vote:
- Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
- Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
- If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
- As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
- Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".
Also remember to add {{Nominated}}
at the top of the article you are nominating.
Every month the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with a Featured icon and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{Featured article}}
template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.
Featured article nominations
List an article and leave your signature (--~~~~) for the nomination(s). Please use the format below for your nominations/showing support or objection.
Nominating:
=== [[Article Name]] ===
[[File:Infobox-Picture.jpg|thumb|left|150px]] '''Nominated by:''' --~~~~
Showing support or objecting:
* '''Strong Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing strong support --~~~~
* '''Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing support --~~~~
* '''Weak Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing weak support --~~~~
* '''Strong Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are strongly objecting --~~~~
* '''Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are objecting --~~~~
* '''Weak Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are weakly objecting --~~~~
{{clear}}
Nominated by: Ronovi Tavisaen, 23:13, 14 October 2012 (PST)
- Strong Support - Eiko's page is a detailed, focused document that provides a deep and carefully crafted look into the character he's worked so hard to build, making it a valuable resource for anyone writing his character and seeking understanding. --Tra'an Reith 23:14, 31 October 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Updated a few formating issues, but otherwise it's a good article. -Solus Gar 23:19, 31 October 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Is it tacky to support myself? One year of work, routinely working. Not to say that I'm proud of my work, but I'm proud of my work. --Eiko 22:27, 1 November 2012 (MDT)
- Support - This article is well designed, easy to read, and informative. -Alaris 23:27, 2 November 2012 (MDT)
Nominated by: Tra'an Reith 23:12, 31 October 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Good structure and content. -Solus Gar 23:19, 31 October 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Solid article. Great info and format and all-around well thought out and well written. I like. --Ronovi Tavisaen 23:29, 31 October 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Well written. Covers the events well. --Macron 20:38, 01 November 2012 (EST)
- Support - Crisp article, good feel. Presents the information cleanly and accessibly and looks fantastic to boot --Eiko 22:20, 1 November 2012 (MDT)
Nominated by: Macron, 20:42, 01 November 2012 (EST)
- Support - Beautiful summary of events in a proven winner of a page (Wiki Gold, Horizons). --Eiko 22:23, 1 November 2012 (MDT)
- Support - Is it bad for me to approve this since I helped write it? Oh, well. It got a Gold Nova. End of story. --Ronovi Tavisaen, 13:27, 02 November 2012 (MDT)