|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| Updated the info, plus put it all in nifty little boxes :) [[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 16:44, 21 May 2007 (MDT) | | Updated the info, plus put it all in nifty little boxes :) [[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 16:44, 21 May 2007 (MDT) |
| * You may also want to update the numbers in parentheses stating how many members of a particular family there are. -- [[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 08:23, 3 July 2007 (MDT) | | * You may also want to update the numbers in parentheses stating how many members of a particular family there are. -- [[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 08:23, 3 July 2007 (MDT) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Italics ==
| |
| "Italics indicate membership in two families."
| |
|
| |
| * "2. Members are only permitted to be in one family at a time and must be at least the rank of Guardian to join, or Battlelord/Exarch/Epis to create." - [[Families#Family Regulation]] -- [[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 07:02, 26 October 2007 (MDT)
| |
Revision as of 18:37, 14 February 2008
Clan names are not families, or at least they shouldn't be. Should we move the Clan Name information to the Clan Title article? Kaine Mandaala 06:41, 13 December 2006 (Mountain Standard Time)
Sure...either or is fine. It was just easier to keep both lists together when doing regular updating of them, but separating them is fine--Halcyon 06:44, 13 December 2006 (Mountain Standard Time)
I don't see why other articles cannot be linked through this one? I have no objection to the MAA being the only one to add or remove Family names (or members of said families), but not allowing the linking of other pages from this one goes against what the Wiki is from a certain point of view. --Tron 21:22, 15 January 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
Updated
Updated the info, plus put it all in nifty little boxes :) Aabs 16:44, 21 May 2007 (MDT)
- You may also want to update the numbers in parentheses stating how many members of a particular family there are. -- RevengeX Palpatine 08:23, 3 July 2007 (MDT)