DJBWiki:Featured article: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
m (I'm being supportive...ish)
Line 59: Line 59:
* '''Strong Support''' - Well-written (and hilarious) article --[[User:Halcyon|Halcyon]] 17:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
* '''Strong Support''' - Well-written (and hilarious) article --[[User:Halcyon|Halcyon]] 17:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
* '''Strong Support''' - Awesome and hilarious --[[User:Howlader|Howlader]]  
* '''Strong Support''' - Awesome and hilarious --[[User:Howlader|Howlader]]  
 
* '''Strong Support''' - Absolutely hilarious. But also well-written, complete, and informative. --[[User:Talos|Talos Erinos]]
{{Clear}}
{{Clear}}



Revision as of 02:28, 7 July 2011

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best DJBWiki has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.


An article must…

  1. …be well written and detailed
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view
  3. …not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
  4. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
  5. …have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
  6. …have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
  7. …have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
  8. …not have been previously featured

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.


How to nominate:

  1. First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
  2. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
  3. Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
  4. The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
  5. Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
  4. Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add {{Nominated}} at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every month the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{Featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{Featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Featured article nominations

List an article and leave your signature (--~~~~) for the nomination(s). Please use the format below for your nominations/showing support or objection.

Nominating:

=== [[Article Name]] ===
[[File:Infobox-Picture.jpg|thumb|left|150px]] '''Nominated by:''' --~~~~

Showing support or objecting:

* '''Strong Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing strong support --~~~~
* '''Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing support --~~~~
* '''Weak Support''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are showing weak support --~~~~
* '''Strong Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are strongly objecting --~~~~
* '''Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are objecting --~~~~
* '''Weak Object''' - A comment/reasoning behind why you are weakly objecting --~~~~
{{clear}}

Old Folks' Home

Nominated by: --Shadow Taldrya 06:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Strong Support - Well-written (and hilarious) article --Halcyon 17:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Awesome and hilarious --Howlader
  • Strong Support - Absolutely hilarious. But also well-written, complete, and informative. --Talos Erinos


Cethgus Entar

Nominated by: Unknown

  • Weak Object - Just a formatting issue... your character history should all be under one main heading, rather than a separate one for each part. Also, you have a lot of headings with only a single paragraph to them... maybe use fewer, broader headings so it's not so broken up --Shadow Taldrya 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


Ood Bnar Sythe'rae

Nominated by: Unknown

  • Support - Images, texts, links, the whole she-bang. Only point of concern is that the succession box templates need to be re-formatted. --Shadow Taldrya 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


Howlader

Nominated by: Shadow Taldrya

  • Strong Support - I supported this article when it was complete, but due to the wiki crash, it needs to be finished before being featured. -- Ronovi Tavisaen, 13:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


Arcona Army Corps

Nominated by: Talos Erinos

  • Support - It has text, images, and categorization... that works for me :P --Shadow Taldrya 00:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)