|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
| |
|
| * Forgot to note, the work done in the biography section is a very, very good start. The stuff above it is still questionable. --[[User:Solari|Solari]] ([[User talk:Solari|talk]]) 02:30, 2 January 2015 (EST) | | * Forgot to note, the work done in the biography section is a very, very good start. The stuff above it is still questionable. --[[User:Solari|Solari]] ([[User talk:Solari|talk]]) 02:30, 2 January 2015 (EST) |
| | |
| | 01/04/2014 - Completed an edit removing a large portion of the Wiki and referring closer to a general background and character explanation. Let me know if this is more in line with what is expected, should you guys have any further suggestions it would be appreciated. - Uji / Donny |
Latest revision as of 02:16, 5 January 2015
Quality
Please refer to the Beginner's Guide and Layout Guide for how a character page is supposed to be formatted and what type of content belongs in the page. Thanks. --Shadow Taldrya (talk) 23:35, 28 September 2014 (EDT)
Again... Since this was ignored last time, a couple things: Your entire wiki page has been done incorrectly. The information on your page does not reflect what a DB character page is supposed to have on it. Review the Beginner's Guide and Layout Guide which are linked above. Also, do not remove tags added by Wiki Staff. --Shadow Taldrya (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2014 (EST)
Third times the charm? The quality tag has been reapplied to your wiki article, for all the reasons Shadow has already mentioned. Here's the thing, the format/content of your page is much more suited to a character sheet (probably why what you've used here is called the Abridged Character Sheet) than an 'encyclopedia'-esq article. My personal suggestion is to take what you have here to create custom aspects on your character sheet, then follow along with the layout and beginner's guides that Shadow linked above. --Solari (talk) 02:27, 2 January 2015 (EST)
- Forgot to note, the work done in the biography section is a very, very good start. The stuff above it is still questionable. --Solari (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2015 (EST)
01/04/2014 - Completed an edit removing a large portion of the Wiki and referring closer to a general background and character explanation. Let me know if this is more in line with what is expected, should you guys have any further suggestions it would be appreciated. - Uji / Donny