Talk:Eric Antilla: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
No edit summary
m (talk template begone!)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
-- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}}, 16 September 2011 21:45 (UTC)
-- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}}, 16 September 2011 21:45 (UTC)


{{WindosTalk|time=22:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)|text=I agree this shouldn't have its own page. But where do we draw the line, e.g. [[Shan Long]]/[[Trevarus Caerick]]}}
I agree this shouldn't have its own page. But where do we draw the line, e.g. [[Shan Long]]/[[Trevarus Caerick]] --[[User:Solari|Solari]] ([[User talk:Solari|talk]]) 22:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


I would even say that the Shan-Long article on its own shouldn't exist. You look at it now, and it's just a stub. On the contrary, Trevarus's actual article has a lot of info on Shan-Long. So I'd say with ''anyone's'' alter-ego/multiple personalities/etc. it should be restricted to the character page. Just cleans up clutter and gives the character article itself more strength and weight.  
I would even say that the Shan-Long article on its own shouldn't exist. You look at it now, and it's just a stub. On the contrary, Trevarus's actual article has a lot of info on Shan-Long. So I'd say with ''anyone's'' alter-ego/multiple personalities/etc. it should be restricted to the character page. Just cleans up clutter and gives the character article itself more strength and weight.  
-- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}}, 18 September 2011 23:09 (UTC)
-- {{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}}, 18 September 2011 23:09 (UTC)


{{HalcTalk|time=12:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)|text=I concur.  This article can be, and should be, rolled up into the "main" character article.  No reason for alias' to have their own page}}
I concur.  This article can be, and should be, rolled up into the "main" character article.  No reason for alias' to have their own page --[[User:Halcyon|Halcyon]] ([[User talk:Halcyon|talk]]) 12:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


Trev's [[Ashen|not the only one]] :P --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 09:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Trev's [[Ashen|not the only one]] :P --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 09:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
And I believe that should be within Muz's main character page as well. :P --{{U|Ronovi Tavisaen}} 23:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:52, 7 October 2014

Does This Merit Its Own Page?

Normally I see aliases, cover identities, and multiple personalities displayed within the actual character page itself. Non-player character implies that this is a character that no one is using. If Eric Antilla is really a name James uses on missions, then I see no reason to have it as its own page instead of an addition on your actual character page. -- Ronovi Tavisaen, 16 September 2011 21:45 (UTC)

I agree this shouldn't have its own page. But where do we draw the line, e.g. Shan Long/Trevarus Caerick --Solari (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I would even say that the Shan-Long article on its own shouldn't exist. You look at it now, and it's just a stub. On the contrary, Trevarus's actual article has a lot of info on Shan-Long. So I'd say with anyone's alter-ego/multiple personalities/etc. it should be restricted to the character page. Just cleans up clutter and gives the character article itself more strength and weight. -- Ronovi Tavisaen, 18 September 2011 23:09 (UTC)

I concur. This article can be, and should be, rolled up into the "main" character article. No reason for alias' to have their own page --Halcyon (talk) 12:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Trev's not the only one :P --Xanos 09:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

And I believe that should be within Muz's main character page as well. :P --Ronovi Tavisaen 23:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)