|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
| |
|
| Except for the fact that all of the links to the "Spectre" page were based off the existing BT page and weren't updated after the fact. *If* this new character is actually alive, then Spectre will have to be a disambiguation page that points to both equally. But really, members should be starting their own pages as part of their promo requirements. I've seen too many blank pages made for new members by their summit that go to waste. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 19:42, 16 September 2013 (MDT) | | Except for the fact that all of the links to the "Spectre" page were based off the existing BT page and weren't updated after the fact. *If* this new character is actually alive, then Spectre will have to be a disambiguation page that points to both equally. But really, members should be starting their own pages as part of their promo requirements. I've seen too many blank pages made for new members by their summit that go to waste. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 19:42, 16 September 2013 (MDT) |
| | |
| | Then please, by all means, set one up instead of reverting. Wouldn't that have been more constructive? -[[User:Archangel|Archangel]] 19:59, 16 September 2013 (MDT) |
Latest revision as of 01:59, 17 September 2013
Ronovi, thank you for your many edits! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagen Phoenix
-
Shadow, this was changed to a fresh page for a new character page instead of a defunct battleteam. There was a still access to the battleteam. All you've done is caused more work. - Archangel 19:24, 16 September 2013 (MDT)
Except for the fact that all of the links to the "Spectre" page were based off the existing BT page and weren't updated after the fact. *If* this new character is actually alive, then Spectre will have to be a disambiguation page that points to both equally. But really, members should be starting their own pages as part of their promo requirements. I've seen too many blank pages made for new members by their summit that go to waste. --Shadow Taldrya 19:42, 16 September 2013 (MDT)
Then please, by all means, set one up instead of reverting. Wouldn't that have been more constructive? -Archangel 19:59, 16 September 2013 (MDT)