|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | I'm going to work with Muz to clean this page up. A lot of it is basically fan fiction from a former member and it does not accurately capture what the Star Chamber was OOC or IC. --[[User:Sarin|GM Sarin]] ([[User talk:Sarin|talk]]) 02:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
| | |
| | |
| If anyone had the time or energy, you could set up a section stating that the current active Star Chamber members include Jac, Firefox, Khyron, Paladin, Havok, Sarin. | | If anyone had the time or energy, you could set up a section stating that the current active Star Chamber members include Jac, Firefox, Khyron, Paladin, Havok, Sarin. |
|
| |
|
Latest revision as of 02:58, 7 May 2024
I'm going to work with Muz to clean this page up. A lot of it is basically fan fiction from a former member and it does not accurately capture what the Star Chamber was OOC or IC. --GM Sarin (talk) 02:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
If anyone had the time or energy, you could set up a section stating that the current active Star Chamber members include Jac, Firefox, Khyron, Paladin, Havok, Sarin.
In addition to Yoni, speculation can be said that Pyralis, Kir, Xanos, Halc, and Raken were all given access to the Star Chamber during their DGM and Praetor roles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarin
Well, it's *supposed* to be a secret who is on the Star Chamber. Everyone knows that the GMs are there, for the most part...it's those that aren't GMs that is widely speculated about. I'm not a huge fan of listing members of this body of secret elders. --
If anyone ever did feel bored, one thing I've always thought would help is someone making a second "Star Chamber (building/structure/something)" entry for the original structure not just the group. Beyond that, I'd probably go with Muz that it may be best just to keep thinks "mysterious". In theory, I don't really have the same hang up with putting up a list, as the idea would still be for said list to be a list of unknowns but... still, you know what people are like. If they can see it, they assume they're able to know it. That said, the page probably could do with an overhaul as I think it's still pretty much just taken verbatim from the ancient DSC entry. Maybe playing up the question marks a bit more could be a good way of making it more unknown by the masses. I'd offer but... er, yeah... I've been thinking of doing it for like the last four years but that evidently hasn't really ever got very far :P --Xanos 10:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)