|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| If you (or another CoJer) adds such an image in the future, make sure to upload the images with both the <nowiki>{{Fairuse}}</nowiki> tag and the <nowiki>[[Category:Images-CoJ Cases]]</nowiki> image category. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 00:47, 29 March 2014 (MDT) | | If you (or another CoJer) adds such an image in the future, make sure to upload the images with both the <nowiki>{{Fairuse}}</nowiki> tag and the <nowiki>[[Category:Images-CoJ Cases]]</nowiki> image category. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 00:47, 29 March 2014 (MDT) |
| | |
| | Copy that on the fair use and category stuff. I mean, I can remove the images on all of the cases. It's not like it's a rule they be there. Admittedly, I think these new ones look pretty cool, but if there's a bandwidth issue then they are purely visual. I can go either way --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 20:42, 29 March 2014 (MDT) |
Revision as of 02:42, 30 March 2014
Shad - are the current CoJ case graphics handled in a different way than just uploading each image? I'm just working to add graphics to cases missing them, though I admittedly like this new design way better. Is your comment about how I'm uploading or the base idea of having graphics on each case? --Aabs 00:41, 29 March 2014 (MDT)
My bad. I wasn't even aware someone had added header images to all those case files. The thing is, had I been aware at the time, I would have told them not to. For the extremely limited amount of times those pages are viewed, uploading all those different images is just a waste of bandwidth. But... since it's already done this way, might as well just continue the practice.
If you (or another CoJer) adds such an image in the future, make sure to upload the images with both the {{Fairuse}} tag and the [[Category:Images-CoJ Cases]] image category. --Shadow Taldrya 00:47, 29 March 2014 (MDT)
Copy that on the fair use and category stuff. I mean, I can remove the images on all of the cases. It's not like it's a rule they be there. Admittedly, I think these new ones look pretty cool, but if there's a bandwidth issue then they are purely visual. I can go either way --Aabs 20:42, 29 March 2014 (MDT)