|
|
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
| |
|
| I'll get with Sam and discuss - the Marked bit was his idea. [[User:Invictus|Invictus]] 14:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC) | | I'll get with Sam and discuss - the Marked bit was his idea. [[User:Invictus|Invictus]] 14:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
| | |
| | |
| | Updated with the new version of Drogon's history. Am I good to remove the Questionable tag? [[User:Invictus|Invictus]] 14:48, 4 March 2012 (MST) |
Revision as of 21:48, 4 March 2012
Questionable
Regarding the Sithspawn awarded for GJW X, the exact wording from the buying spreadsheet states...
"Darth Ashen (in an almost unprecedented display of generosity) following the Tenth Great Jedi War saw fit to award his Clans and Houses with information gleaned from the Holocron of Antiquities that detailed how to create various sithspawn. However knowledge alone isn't enough, and often the Clans and Houses discovered the Sith Alchemy and harnessing Sithspawn was more costly than they could imagine."
As such, any articles created regarding the Sithspawn should follow that initial blurb in some way. And no, the Marked of the Wanderer will not be a part of that package --Halcyon 14:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll get with Sam and discuss - the Marked bit was his idea. Invictus 14:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Updated with the new version of Drogon's history. Am I good to remove the Questionable tag? Invictus 14:48, 4 March 2012 (MST)