|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| Unless the other Clans have information for a "Commander General" rank for themselves, I don't see why not. And as a sidenote, a suggestion from yours truly: Merge all the CNS rank/title pages into one article. -- [[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 19:21, 5 December 2007 (MST) | | Unless the other Clans have information for a "Commander General" rank for themselves, I don't see why not. And as a sidenote, a suggestion from yours truly: Merge all the CNS rank/title pages into one article. -- [[User:RevengeX|RevengeX Palpatine]] 19:21, 5 December 2007 (MST) |
| | |
| | Main dislike I have with one page is I think it'd be too information heavy and put people off reading. With shorter pages if they happen to click the link there's more chance of them actually glancing at what it says. *shrugs* I'm a wiki traditionalist though in believing everything should have an individual article, I've never been a big fan of extra long pages. Going back to the redirect... I can't say I'm fussed either way. If anyone else ever needs to use the link we could always just turn it into a disambig page later on or something I guess. --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 05:32, 6 December 2007 (MST) |
Latest revision as of 12:32, 6 December 2007
Should such a broad/widely used military rank be directed to a CNS-only entry? --Shadow Taldrya 18:17, 5 December 2007 (MST)
Unless the other Clans have information for a "Commander General" rank for themselves, I don't see why not. And as a sidenote, a suggestion from yours truly: Merge all the CNS rank/title pages into one article. -- RevengeX Palpatine 19:21, 5 December 2007 (MST)
Main dislike I have with one page is I think it'd be too information heavy and put people off reading. With shorter pages if they happen to click the link there's more chance of them actually glancing at what it says. *shrugs* I'm a wiki traditionalist though in believing everything should have an individual article, I've never been a big fan of extra long pages. Going back to the redirect... I can't say I'm fussed either way. If anyone else ever needs to use the link we could always just turn it into a disambig page later on or something I guess. --Xanos 05:32, 6 December 2007 (MST)