|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
| Hehe... the problem with that is your average member doesn't have access to pictures that aren't already on his/her dossier - yet we're being told not to add said pictures without adding a paragraph+ of info on them. Yet we're also demanded to keep our articles from being pictureless. Someone has to make a decision one way or the other unless we just want to spam the DB wiki with random SW pics :P --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 22:16, 13 October 2007 (MDT) | | Hehe... the problem with that is your average member doesn't have access to pictures that aren't already on his/her dossier - yet we're being told not to add said pictures without adding a paragraph+ of info on them. Yet we're also demanded to keep our articles from being pictureless. Someone has to make a decision one way or the other unless we just want to spam the DB wiki with random SW pics :P --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 22:16, 13 October 2007 (MDT) |
| | |
| | Warbanners, Robes, and Lightsabers (especially non-modified) really are abused on character articles. Individuals think that the wiki articles replace their dossier, so they add those as well as every last SA course they've passed and every last medal they've earned. There are a horde of SW and other images out there on the web that anyone has access to that they can use on their articles to spice them up without having to throw in their dossier images. --[[User:Tron|Tron]] 01:42, 14 October 2007 (MDT) |
Revision as of 07:42, 14 October 2007
You need to at least include the information on why you are considered an influential member. -- Kaine Mandaala 14:13, 16 October 2006 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Sorry, didnt notice there was discussion here.
I dont remember listing myself as influential. If I did, it was because I was P:GM at the time. Now that Im not P, Im not influential. Well, I mean, I may still have some influenza...er, influence. But Im happy just being prominent (thanks to whoever added me to that; I blame/thank Tron) :D
Ok, TT :P
The article itself is long, yes, but that isn't really a problem. What we need, however, is more pictures. Skimming, your history has... zero pictures. Which makes it look long and boring. Add in some pictures to spice it up, and things will be super sweet, featured article quality perhaps --Aabs 21:54, 13 October 2007 (MDT)
Hehe... the problem with that is your average member doesn't have access to pictures that aren't already on his/her dossier - yet we're being told not to add said pictures without adding a paragraph+ of info on them. Yet we're also demanded to keep our articles from being pictureless. Someone has to make a decision one way or the other unless we just want to spam the DB wiki with random SW pics :P --Shadow Taldrya 22:16, 13 October 2007 (MDT)
Warbanners, Robes, and Lightsabers (especially non-modified) really are abused on character articles. Individuals think that the wiki articles replace their dossier, so they add those as well as every last SA course they've passed and every last medal they've earned. There are a horde of SW and other images out there on the web that anyone has access to that they can use on their articles to spice them up without having to throw in their dossier images. --Tron 01:42, 14 October 2007 (MDT)