|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| I dont remember listing myself as influential. If I did, it was because I was P:GM at the time. Now that Im not P, Im not influential. Well, I mean, I may still have some influenza...er, influence. But Im happy just being prominent (thanks to whoever added me to that; I blame/thank Tron) :D | | I dont remember listing myself as influential. If I did, it was because I was P:GM at the time. Now that Im not P, Im not influential. Well, I mean, I may still have some influenza...er, influence. But Im happy just being prominent (thanks to whoever added me to that; I blame/thank Tron) :D |
|
| |
|
| It would help if you looked it's splitting this article into more subsections or something. Right now, you just have long main sections, but sections can go all the way to =======, so... yeah... --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 14:52, 26 June 2007 (MDT)
| | Ok, TT :P |
| | |
| | The article itself is long, yes, but that isn't really a problem. What we need, however, is more pictures. Skimming, your history has... zero pictures. Which makes it look long and boring. Add in some pictures to spice it up, and things will be super sweet, featured article quality perhaps --[[User:Aabsdu|Aabs]] 21:54, 13 October 2007 (MDT) |
Revision as of 03:54, 14 October 2007
You need to at least include the information on why you are considered an influential member. -- Kaine Mandaala 14:13, 16 October 2006 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Sorry, didnt notice there was discussion here.
I dont remember listing myself as influential. If I did, it was because I was P:GM at the time. Now that Im not P, Im not influential. Well, I mean, I may still have some influenza...er, influence. But Im happy just being prominent (thanks to whoever added me to that; I blame/thank Tron) :D
Ok, TT :P
The article itself is long, yes, but that isn't really a problem. What we need, however, is more pictures. Skimming, your history has... zero pictures. Which makes it look long and boring. Add in some pictures to spice it up, and things will be super sweet, featured article quality perhaps --Aabs 21:54, 13 October 2007 (MDT)