|
|
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
| |
|
| ... Kir Katarn's wiki entry is indeed "featured" worthy. Didn't want to be totally negative. [[User:Vladimir|Vladimir]] 18:49, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time) | | ... Kir Katarn's wiki entry is indeed "featured" worthy. Didn't want to be totally negative. [[User:Vladimir|Vladimir]] 18:49, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time) |
| | |
| | Firefox' is waiting for updates, and continously pushed down until it is full enough, like what happened to Jac's.--[[User:Korras|Korras]] 22:31, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time) |
Revision as of 05:31, 2 February 2007
Moved Jac down a week to buy more time. -- Kaine Mandaala 02:25, 1 November 2006 (Mountain Standard Time)
Shouldn't we make sure articles meet Featured Article quality first and only then add them to the FA queue? -- Reblet 04:27, 15 January 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
That would make a certain amount of sense, yes. Vladimir 11:24, 15 January 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
I'm sorry ... who is nominating these "featured" articles? Firefox's article is nothing more than a glorified stub and a whole section or two of history is missing from Sarin's entry (although it is coming along rather nicely). A new system needs to be implemented. Vladimir 18:05, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
... Kir Katarn's wiki entry is indeed "featured" worthy. Didn't want to be totally negative. Vladimir 18:49, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)
Firefox' is waiting for updates, and continously pushed down until it is full enough, like what happened to Jac's.--Korras 22:31, 1 February 2007 (Mountain Standard Time)