|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
| Breaking your NPC articles up so that there are a handful in each category just doesn't make much sense to me, but I'll let Ben make the final call on that. For now, I've made your allies, neutral, and enemies as a sub-category of your NPCs. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 19:44, 9 April 2012 (MDT) | | Breaking your NPC articles up so that there are a handful in each category just doesn't make much sense to me, but I'll let Ben make the final call on that. For now, I've made your allies, neutral, and enemies as a sub-category of your NPCs. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 19:44, 9 April 2012 (MDT) |
| | |
| | The ally/neutral/enemy subcategories are fine, especially if you plan on having lots of each in the future, but I think it is important to keep the NPCs category. There was a document made a while back (that I should probably try to dig up) where the categories were planned out and organized. --[[User:BenevolentWhiner|Benevolent Whiner]] <small>([[User talk:BenevolentWhiner|talk]] - [[dossier:2706|dossier]])</small> 22:16, 9 April 2012 (MDT) |
Revision as of 04:16, 10 April 2012
Deletion Flag
The Quaestor of Plagueis has given me leave to reorganize all of PLA's NPCs into Ally, Neutral, Enemy, and Flora/Fauna categories. Thus, this page is obsolete, empty, and needs to be deleted. Thanks!
- While it's fine if the Plagueis QUA is ok with it...is the wiki tribune cool with it? I think all of these categories were set-up in a way so that all units had similar categories that could be easily found. While each unit will have unique categories, I think each one should also have similar ones. Would it be a better idea to instead have sub-categories? If you're really going to that that many new and unique pages --Halcyon 19:31, 9 April 2012 (MDT)
Honestly, for the number of pages within each of these categories (that you've already made), there is very little reason to have more than a single, unit-based category like everyone else. NPCs should all belong to the singular "UNIT NPCs" category and then be further sub-categorized by what they were used for. For example, CNS has many NPCs listed in their category that are also categorized by the competition/event they were used in.
Breaking your NPC articles up so that there are a handful in each category just doesn't make much sense to me, but I'll let Ben make the final call on that. For now, I've made your allies, neutral, and enemies as a sub-category of your NPCs. --Shadow Taldrya 19:44, 9 April 2012 (MDT)
The ally/neutral/enemy subcategories are fine, especially if you plan on having lots of each in the future, but I think it is important to keep the NPCs category. There was a document made a while back (that I should probably try to dig up) where the categories were planned out and organized. --Benevolent Whiner (talk - dossier) 22:16, 9 April 2012 (MDT)