Talk:Odan-Urr United Space Command: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia of the Dark Brotherhood, an online Star Wars Club
(Created page with "The massive list of possessions items is a very bad combination of likely to become out of date, a massive pain to keep maintained, and basically useless. Is there a reason to have this when you can just link to the canonical list [https://www.darkjedibrotherhood.com/units/odan-urr/possessions here]? ~~~~")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The massive list of possessions items is a very bad combination of likely to become out of date, a massive pain to keep maintained, and basically useless. Is there a reason to have this when you can just link to the canonical list [https://www.darkjedibrotherhood.com/units/odan-urr/possessions here]? [[User:Alethia Archenksova|Alethia Archenksova]] ([[User talk:Alethia Archenksova|talk]]) 04:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The massive list of possessions items is a very bad combination of likely to become out of date, a massive pain to keep maintained, and basically useless. Is there a reason to have this when you can just link to the canonical list [https://www.darkjedibrotherhood.com/units/odan-urr/possessions here]? [[User:Alethia Archenksova|Alethia Archenksova]] ([[User talk:Alethia Archenksova|talk]]) 04:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I was updating following the legacy styling of the page, but I agree entirely with the points you've brought up. As we've discussed elsewhere, I'll likely be deprecating the listing to a link to the relevant Container for O.U.S.C. Materials and subsections under relevant sections to explain roles or notate specialties, unless a unit is defined to the level of having its own entry, in which case it will, itself, be properly linked off. [[User:Wolfe Whitehorn|Wolfe Whitehorn]] ([[User talk:Wolfe Whitehorn|talk]]) 15:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:25, 27 June 2024

The massive list of possessions items is a very bad combination of likely to become out of date, a massive pain to keep maintained, and basically useless. Is there a reason to have this when you can just link to the canonical list here? Alethia Archenksova (talk) 04:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

I was updating following the legacy styling of the page, but I agree entirely with the points you've brought up. As we've discussed elsewhere, I'll likely be deprecating the listing to a link to the relevant Container for O.U.S.C. Materials and subsections under relevant sections to explain roles or notate specialties, unless a unit is defined to the level of having its own entry, in which case it will, itself, be properly linked off. Wolfe Whitehorn (talk) 15:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)