|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| That's fine. But as the ship "history" still makes it seem like the previous version, it was a safe bet to assume this was the same vessel as well --[[User:Halcyon|Halcyon]] 09:20, 19 October 2007 (MDT) | | That's fine. But as the ship "history" still makes it seem like the previous version, it was a safe bet to assume this was the same vessel as well --[[User:Halcyon|Halcyon]] 09:20, 19 October 2007 (MDT) |
| | |
| | It pretty much is. Since Raken fucked up and blew it up, we're effectively retconning it back. - [[User:Oberst|Oberst]] 09:26, 19 October 2007 (MDT) |
Revision as of 15:26, 19 October 2007
In the GJW fiction, this vessel was destroyed. While Tarentum has a Belarus cruiser, technically it should be a completely different ship. A new name/page would be needed --Halcyon 19:50, 18 October 2007 (MDT)
New ship, redesignated Acheron. It happens, you know. Sometimes navies like a specific name and will keep the name alive, see: USS Enterprise, USS Baltimore, HMS Victory, HMS Exeter, La Redoutable. - Oberst 09:16, 19 October 2007 (MDT)
That's fine. But as the ship "history" still makes it seem like the previous version, it was a safe bet to assume this was the same vessel as well --Halcyon 09:20, 19 October 2007 (MDT)
It pretty much is. Since Raken fucked up and blew it up, we're effectively retconning it back. - Oberst 09:26, 19 October 2007 (MDT)