|
|
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- [[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- [[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| This is a bit late, but it depends on the article. You might have trouble fitting it in as a siedbar if the page already has an infobox, but a footnotes on top of footnotes never looks great either. 09:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | | This is a bit late, but it depends on the article. You might have trouble fitting it in as a siedbar if the page already has an infobox, but a footnotes on top of footnotes never looks great either. -- [[Impetus M'Nar]] 09:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:49, 24 July 2009
I keep wondering... would this be better reformatted as a horizontal box at the bottom of articles? It just tends to be too long for many articles and/or gets in the way of ith images, etc. Probably wouldn't be too hard to convert the main Template:Naga Sadow one if wanted. --Xanos 16:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- Alaris 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a bit late, but it depends on the article. You might have trouble fitting it in as a siedbar if the page already has an infobox, but a footnotes on top of footnotes never looks great either. -- Impetus M'Nar 09:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)