|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Ashura, we never revoked Rai or Tiss. I see there is apparently a (new?) rule on the Clan Naming Policies [[Family_and_Clan_Naming_Policies|page]] about how they automatically get it removed when they go Rogue but CNS has never enforced that - retirement doesn't erase their contributions to the Clan and we've always prefered people not unnecessarily clog up the Clan roster pretending they're active and causing resentment by escaping AWOL checks if they're really retired. --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 06:01, 27 May 2008 (MDT) | | Ashura, we never revoked Rai or Tiss. I see there is apparently a (new?) rule on the Clan Naming Policies [[Family_and_Clan_Naming_Policies|page]] about how they automatically get it removed when they go Rogue but CNS has never enforced that - retirement doesn't erase their contributions to the Clan and we've always prefered people not unnecessarily clog up the Clan roster pretending they're active and causing resentment by escaping AWOL checks if they're really retired. --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 06:01, 27 May 2008 (MDT) |
| | |
| | I was just updating it to reflected all your dossiers... as it doesnt have them down as Sons on Rai or Tiss dossiers. Change it back to how it was. I have no problems. ;) --[[User:Ashura Isradia|Ashura]] 14:16, 27 May 2008 (GMT) |
Revision as of 13:19, 27 May 2008
Ashura, we never revoked Rai or Tiss. I see there is apparently a (new?) rule on the Clan Naming Policies page about how they automatically get it removed when they go Rogue but CNS has never enforced that - retirement doesn't erase their contributions to the Clan and we've always prefered people not unnecessarily clog up the Clan roster pretending they're active and causing resentment by escaping AWOL checks if they're really retired. --Xanos 06:01, 27 May 2008 (MDT)
I was just updating it to reflected all your dossiers... as it doesnt have them down as Sons on Rai or Tiss dossiers. Change it back to how it was. I have no problems. ;) --Ashura 14:16, 27 May 2008 (GMT)