|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| ::After looking over things in the article, I found that some of the stuff is emphasized, but after attempting a troubleshoot, I am unaware of where the possible ''bug'' lies.[[User:Daedric Turelles|Daedric Turelles]] ([[User talk:Daedric Turelles|talk]]) 02:33, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | | ::After looking over things in the article, I found that some of the stuff is emphasized, but after attempting a troubleshoot, I am unaware of where the possible ''bug'' lies.[[User:Daedric Turelles|Daedric Turelles]] ([[User talk:Daedric Turelles|talk]]) 02:33, 30 August 2014 (EDT) |
| :::Fixed [[User:Daedric Turelles|Daedric Turelles]] ([[User talk:Daedric Turelles|talk]]) 04:11, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | | :::Fixed [[User:Daedric Turelles|Daedric Turelles]] ([[User talk:Daedric Turelles|talk]]) 04:11, 30 August 2014 (EDT) |
| | |
| | ===Layout=== |
| | Just wondering, does anybody have an ideas on the layout? Thoughts? Comments? [[User:Daedric Turelles|Daedric Turelles]] ([[User talk:Daedric Turelles|talk]]) 01:02, 1 September 2014 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:02, 1 September 2014
Italics
Wiki markup for emphasized (aka italic) text is double apostrophes like ''words in italics'' rather than using the <em> tag. --Shadow Taldrya (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- Understood. I'll go back and make the correct changes to the page. Daedric Turelles (talk) 01:11, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- Correction has been made. Sorry about that, i'm used to HTML. Daedric Turelles (talk) 01:19, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- After looking over things in the article, I found that some of the stuff is emphasized, but after attempting a troubleshoot, I am unaware of where the possible bug lies.Daedric Turelles (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- Fixed Daedric Turelles (talk) 04:11, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
Layout
Just wondering, does anybody have an ideas on the layout? Thoughts? Comments? Daedric Turelles (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2014 (EDT)