|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| And Slagar made this template work for all 3 of the Orders with just one template. That is a win in my book. Fewer templates to maintain in the long run. --[[User:Orv Dessrx|Orv Dessrx]] 00:02, 26 April 2009 (MDT) | | And Slagar made this template work for all 3 of the Orders with just one template. That is a win in my book. Fewer templates to maintain in the long run. --[[User:Orv Dessrx|Orv Dessrx]] 00:02, 26 April 2009 (MDT) |
| | |
| | Which will be a lot less confusing for future newbs too. However, a few things I think would make it look a bit better: bold the heading text (I like bold headings), lose the different colors to the fields, and maybe change "type" to "order" so it's even less confusing as to what it's asking for. Then maybe we can go about changing all the pages to this. Just a suggestion. --[[User:Shadow Taldrya|Shadow Taldrya]] 00:10, 26 April 2009 (MDT) |
Revision as of 06:10, 26 April 2009
Is this being used for a specific purpose? We already have templates for the three orders and elders... why do we need another? --Shadow Taldrya 23:55, 25 April 2009 (MDT)
Nevermind... it looks cooler than the others. --Shadow Taldrya 00:00, 26 April 2009 (MDT)
And Slagar made this template work for all 3 of the Orders with just one template. That is a win in my book. Fewer templates to maintain in the long run. --Orv Dessrx 00:02, 26 April 2009 (MDT)
Which will be a lot less confusing for future newbs too. However, a few things I think would make it look a bit better: bold the heading text (I like bold headings), lose the different colors to the fields, and maybe change "type" to "order" so it's even less confusing as to what it's asking for. Then maybe we can go about changing all the pages to this. Just a suggestion. --Shadow Taldrya 00:10, 26 April 2009 (MDT)