|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
| |
|
| I agree. I have deleted the material from this page because it was horribly out of date. I inserted the external link to the Dark Covenant website. When I'm finished with the CoJ case pages I will start working on this, but instead of containing another copy of the entire DCov, it will just have information such as origins, amendments, FAQ, etc. If you have any suggestions for other information I should include, post it up here. --[[User:Kir Taldrya Katarn|Kir Taldrya Katarn]] 15:05, 9 October 2007 (MDT) | | I agree. I have deleted the material from this page because it was horribly out of date. I inserted the external link to the Dark Covenant website. When I'm finished with the CoJ case pages I will start working on this, but instead of containing another copy of the entire DCov, it will just have information such as origins, amendments, FAQ, etc. If you have any suggestions for other information I should include, post it up here. --[[User:Kir Taldrya Katarn|Kir Taldrya Katarn]] 15:05, 9 October 2007 (MDT) |
| | |
| | Note to myself: include "Justicar's Hints" or something of the sort in the new document to point out complicated or often misunderstood sections of the Covenant and explain them in an easy-to-understand way. --[[User:Kir Taldrya Katarn|Kir Taldrya Katarn]] 18:16, 11 February 2008 (MST) |
Revision as of 01:16, 12 February 2008
My suggestion, just make links to the Articles and Sections (i.e. Section 1.01) but not for each letter. It makes the contents excessively and unnecessarily long. Yes you can hide the contents, but then what is the point of having it. --Tron 14:14, 30 September 2006 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Feel free to do that, Tron. I just put the Covenant on the page because it needed to be there instead of the placeholder stuff that was there. The long contents doesn't really bother me much since, as you said, it can be hidden. --Retoru 14:58, 30 September 2006 (Mountain Daylight Time)
New Format
This is in need of MASSIVE updates. I will take care of it when I'm done with the CoJ case pages. --Kir Taldrya Katarn 20:51, 7 October 2007 (MDT)
We should *not* have th Cov doubled up here. Rather, we should haveinformation here about the Covenant in general, its adoption and other stuff...then a link to the covenant.djb.com site. - Jac
I agree. I have deleted the material from this page because it was horribly out of date. I inserted the external link to the Dark Covenant website. When I'm finished with the CoJ case pages I will start working on this, but instead of containing another copy of the entire DCov, it will just have information such as origins, amendments, FAQ, etc. If you have any suggestions for other information I should include, post it up here. --Kir Taldrya Katarn 15:05, 9 October 2007 (MDT)
Note to myself: include "Justicar's Hints" or something of the sort in the new document to point out complicated or often misunderstood sections of the Covenant and explain them in an easy-to-understand way. --Kir Taldrya Katarn 18:16, 11 February 2008 (MST)