|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| I keep wondering... would this be better reformatted as a horizontal box at the bottom of articles? It just tends to be too long for many articles and/or gets in the way of ith images, etc. Probably wouldn't be too hard to convert the main [[Template:Naga Sadow]] one if wanted. --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 16:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | I keep wondering... would this be better reformatted as a horizontal box at the bottom of articles? It just tends to be too long for many articles and/or gets in the way of ith images, etc. Probably wouldn't be too hard to convert the main [[Template:Naga Sadow|'''Template''':Naga Sadow]] one if wanted. --[[User:Xanos|Xanos]] 16:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- [[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | | It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- [[User:Alaris|Alaris]] 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
| This is a bit late, but it depends on the article. You might have trouble fitting it in as a siedbar if the page already has an infobox, but a footnotes on top of footnotes never looks great either. 09:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
Latest revision as of 07:24, 23 May 2011
I keep wondering... would this be better reformatted as a horizontal box at the bottom of articles? It just tends to be too long for many articles and/or gets in the way of ith images, etc. Probably wouldn't be too hard to convert the main Template:Naga Sadow one if wanted. --Xanos 16:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
It probably would work better as a Horizontal box. It works as a better footnote than a sidebar. -- Alaris 19:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)